Is there some sort of a bonus system at CNet for writers who can make inflammatory statements? Do they get paid extra based on the number of page views each article generates? Because if that’s true then we can understand that they are just taking a page out of the tool’s box of hackneyed journalism tips for generating ad revenue.

Here’s the latest round of lies, damned lies, and CNet “Reporting” (with apologies to actual reporters for lumping them in with this sort of crap).

Continue Reading »